Here’s Jason’s bio:
Okay, in terms of rhetorical patterns, we’ve got “Opposite Impossible Woman” You can see the reel here:
“Opposite Impossible Woman” always lacks logical cohesion. This is a problem in terms of very basic reasoning skills, and you probably don’t want to date anyone who struggles with basic reasoning skills; his life is a disaster and he’s going to be a pain in the ass (or just an ass).
But Jason’s problems continue beyond demanding his opposite impossible woman.
He then says, “Be yourself,” which should be the end of the statement. That’s literally what the statement means: it’s okay to be exactly who you actually are.
But then Jason LISTS the adjectives I would need to be (and it’s the same cliche parade as always: “nice, fit, kind,” etc.) 🙄🙄🙄
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
So that doesn’t make any sense either. Jason doesn’t want me to be myself; he wants me to be all these adjectives.
Bonus reason to mock him: He chose “the way to win me over” prompt 🤢🤮🥴
Are you all running into these guys?
I'll pass on winning you over, Jason.
These guys are everywhere. They spend all their time dreaming of a woman to fulfill every possible need. Pretty sure Jason doesn't understand women are human beings.
Be yourself but let me help you out by telling you who I’d like you to be.